Which type of negligence defense is based on the injured party's involvement in the action?

The correct answer is based on the concept of contributory negligence, which asserts that if an injured party is found to have participated in or contributed to the harm they suffered, their ability to recover damages may be reduced or completely barred. This legal principle essentially recognizes that negligence can be a shared responsibility.

In the context of contributory negligence, if the plaintiff's own negligence is determined to have played a role in the incident that caused their injury, then their claim for damages is negatively affected. For instance, if a person ignores a warning sign and acts in a way that leads to an accident, their own actions could be considered negligent. Depending on the jurisdiction, this may mean they are unable to recover any damages if their negligence is found to be a contributing factor to the incident.

In contrast, the other options represent different legal defenses related to negligence. For instance, comparative negligence allows for the assignment of fault between parties and reduces damages accordingly, rather than completely barring recovery. Assumption of risk involves a scenario where the injured party acknowledges and accepts the risks inherent in an activity, potentially limiting their ability to claim damages. Vicarious liability refers to the situation where one party is held responsible for the negligent actions of another, such as an employer being held